<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Cruft Of My Brain &#187; vmware</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thecruftofmybrain.com/tag/vmware/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thecruftofmybrain.com</link>
	<description>Purging my mental dust bunnies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2011 16:54:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>VMWare ESX on a Cisco Network Module?</title>
		<link>http://www.thecruftofmybrain.com/2008/09/13/vmware-esx-on-a-cisco-network-module/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thecruftofmybrain.com/2008/09/13/vmware-esx-on-a-cisco-network-module/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 14:42:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>scott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cisco Routing and Switching]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VoIP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[esx]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vmware]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecruftofmybrain.com/?p=258</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Could it be?Â  I just read this over at GigaOm and I think Allan&#8217;s missing the boat.Â  Now, I&#8217;m sure he&#8217;s tapped into a lot more resources than I am, but it just doesn&#8217;t seem right.Â  I could see Cisco wanting to see how they can help in the data center to make VMWare a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could it be?Â  I just read <a href="http://gigaom.com/2008/09/12/cisco-to-support-vmware/">this over at GigaOm</a> and I think Allan&#8217;s missing the boat.Â  Now, I&#8217;m sure he&#8217;s tapped into a lot more resources than I am, but it just doesn&#8217;t seem right.Â  I could see Cisco wanting to see how they can help in the data center to make VMWare a better platform than it already is.Â  The VMotion technology already works very well, but what&#8217;s to stop Cisco from putting some performance hooks in their secret sauce to make it that much better than Juniper.Â  Also, considering their push into SAN technologies it&#8217;s really not a stretch.</p>
<p>I have a different thought.</p>
<p>Cisco&#8217;s been shipping what are essentially Linux appliances on NetMods for quite a while now.Â  The NM-CUE, the IPS module and the WAAS modules are examples, but there are others.Â  I believe these are x86 based appliances.Â  These appliances are part of the less frequently used &#8220;Branch in a Box&#8221; term that Cisco targets for their <a href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps5854/index.html">2800</a> and <a href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps5855/index.html">3800</a> series routers.Â  The idea being a single router, which has to be there no matter what, can also bundle in an <a href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/routers/ps5855/product_data_sheet0900aecd8028d15f_ps5854_Products_Data_Sheet.html">Ethernet switch with POE</a>, <a href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/modules/ps5365/products_data_sheet09186a0080191d41.html">Voice interfaces</a> to service local calls, SRST for redundancy on the voice, a <a href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/modules/ps5949/ps6246/product_data_sheet0900aecd8028cc7b.html">wireless AP on an HWIC</a>, local <a href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/solutions/collateral/ns340/ns517/ns477/ns296/data_sheet2_c78_390196.html">Unity Express</a> perhaps, local <a href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/vpndevc/ps5729/ps5713/ps4077/product_data_sheet0900aecd805baef2_ps2706_Products_Data_Sheet.html">IPS</a> for distributed security, onboard IOS firewall, <a href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/contnetw/ps5680/ps6870/product_data_sheet0900aecd8058218c_ps2797_Products_Data_Sheet.html">WAAS</a> module&#8230;and I&#8217;m probably missing something.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the current problem.Â  You can only put a couple of these in at a time!Â  There&#8217;s no way to put all of this in one box (nevermind the wisdom of doing such a thing).</p>
<p>Regarding Allen&#8217;s assertion that developers would have to develop for something other than x86 because Cisco doesn&#8217;t use that, sorry Allen, you&#8217;d be wrong about that.Â  The NM-CUE and similar modules use a P3 and even the AIM-CUE which is a tiny motherboard attached daughtercard uses a Celeron!</p>
<p>My prediction, look for some beefier NM type appliances.Â  Maybe even something with Dual Cores.Â  This will be a &#8220;VMWare ESX&#8221; appliance in the NM form factor.Â  It&#8217;ll probably even be a couple of them at different sizes to fit the double wide slots.Â  You&#8217;ll choose based on how many VM&#8217;s you want to run at a time.Â  Of course, the IPS, Unity Express, WAAS and other images will all be available, for a license fee.</p>
<p>The big question is, will they also open it to allow you to run your own VM&#8217;s on it?Â  Maybe but maybe not.Â  Cisco has a history of not allowing that kind of thing.Â  But here&#8217;s an idea, how about running your small(ish) Windows 2003/8 server in VM?Â  Maybe even something with the WAAS secret sauce built right in.Â  If it&#8217;s a new enough processor you might even be looking a x64.Â  How about installing Exchange 2007 in that VM as well!</p>
<p>Now we really are talking about Branch in a Box!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thecruftofmybrain.com/2008/09/13/vmware-esx-on-a-cisco-network-module/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

