<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Cruft Of My Brain &#187; Cisco Routing and Switching</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thecruftofmybrain.com/category/networking/cisco-routing-and-switching/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thecruftofmybrain.com</link>
	<description>Purging my mental dust bunnies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2011 16:54:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Stacking a Cisco 3750x into a plain 3750 stack</title>
		<link>http://www.thecruftofmybrain.com/2011/12/15/stacking-a-cisco-3750x-into-a-plain-3750-stack/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thecruftofmybrain.com/2011/12/15/stacking-a-cisco-3750x-into-a-plain-3750-stack/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 00:27:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>scott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cisco Routing and Switching]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Networking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecruftofmybrain.com/?p=531</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve had all kinds of problems with this tonight. Luckily, none have affected the operating stack which is a pair of 3750&#8242;s. Not E&#8217;s or V2&#8242;s but original 3750&#8242;s. I&#8217;m trying to add a 3750X which is supposed to work just fine. I&#8217;ve done all kinds of things including about 10 different versions of 12.2.55 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve had all kinds of problems with this tonight.  Luckily, none have affected the operating stack which is a pair of 3750&#8242;s.  Not E&#8217;s or V2&#8242;s but original 3750&#8242;s.  I&#8217;m trying to add a 3750X which is supposed to work just fine.  I&#8217;ve done all kinds of things including about 10 different versions of 12.2.55 to no avail.  I had another problem with the 3750x being LANBASE so I got a temp license (which I&#8217;ll have to pay for) for the IPBASE image.  The versions, license levels and all of that are exactly the same.  Then I stumble across this <a href="http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/153515#153515">post</a>:</p>
<p><code>I recently stacked 3750x-48pf-s running ip base with 3750v2-24. I originally attempted to use 12.2(55) but the stack failed to initialize, almost like the stack ports on the 3750x were err-disabling. </p>
<p>After some hair pulling I downgraded to 12.2(53) ( lowest version supported by both) and it did a full EEPROM rewrite on the 3750x. The stacking worked properly after that. </code></p>
<p>That is exactly my problem!</p>
<p>I&#8217;m currently installing 12.2(53) and it&#8217;s running a lengthy microcode update.  I mean lengthy.  This better work!</p>
<p>Update:  Downgrading all of the switches to 12.2(53) worked although the new 3750x decided to be master and wiped out my config.  Good thing we had a backup.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thecruftofmybrain.com/2011/12/15/stacking-a-cisco-3750x-into-a-plain-3750-stack/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CCNP Routing and Switching Quick Reference review</title>
		<link>http://www.thecruftofmybrain.com/2011/03/14/ccnp-routing-and-switching-quick-reference-review/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thecruftofmybrain.com/2011/03/14/ccnp-routing-and-switching-quick-reference-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2011 21:19:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>scott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cisco Routing and Switching]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cruft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Networking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecruftofmybrain.com/?p=511</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s taken me a while but I finally have another review to provide. I was due for my CCNP recert so I decided to go for the Switching test, 642-813. I started with this book: My focus was on the switching section so this review really only addresses that part. I&#8217;ve been taking Cisco tests [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s taken me a while but I finally have another review to provide.  I was due for my CCNP recert so I decided to go for the Switching test, 642-813.  I started with this book:</p>
<p><iframe src="http://rcm.amazon.com/e/cm?lt1=_blank&#038;bc1=000000&#038;IS2=1&#038;nou=1&#038;bg1=FFFFFF&#038;fc1=000000&#038;lc1=0000FF&#038;t=thcrofmybr-20&#038;o=1&#038;p=8&#038;l=as4&#038;m=amazon&#038;f=ifr&#038;ref=ss_til&#038;asins=1587202840" style="width:120px;height:240px;" scrolling="no" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" frameborder="0"></iframe></p>
<p>My focus was on the switching section so this review really only addresses that part.  I&#8217;ve been taking Cisco tests for a while so the process was familiar to me.  I also had a good foundation in switching technologies.  The book does a good job of breaking down the separate areas that the test focuses on.  You couldn&#8217;t use this book to study for the CCNP if you&#8217;re coming right from the CCNA.  It&#8217;s strictly a refresher level of knowledge.  What I found was that there were several parts of the test that were more obscure but were referenced in the book.  It wasn&#8217;t verbatim of course, but it was familiar enough to help me pass.</p>
<p>Another thing I found relevant is that the distilled information in this book is good for reminding me of the little things that can be done to tweak a network.  I think most of us are content to worry about HSRP priorities and STP roots.  We don&#8217;t so much focus on the other loop prevention tools that Cisco&#8217;s made available.  Thanks to the short and direct content in this book, you can quickly get a sense for the other technologies at your disposal.</p>
<p>And I passed.  Highly recommended!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thecruftofmybrain.com/2011/03/14/ccnp-routing-and-switching-quick-reference-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cisco and Extreme interoperability – Part 2 – LACP</title>
		<link>http://www.thecruftofmybrain.com/2010/12/04/cisco-and-extreme-interoperability-%e2%80%93-part-2-%e2%80%93-lacp/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thecruftofmybrain.com/2010/12/04/cisco-and-extreme-interoperability-%e2%80%93-part-2-%e2%80%93-lacp/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Dec 2010 14:05:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>scott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cisco Routing and Switching]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cruft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Networking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecruftofmybrain.com/?p=507</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow&#8230;4+ years later and I&#8217;m finally posting part 2. Yep, the original config didn&#8217;t work quite right but I did get it working. Here&#8217;s the result: On the Cisco switch: interface Port-channel98 no ip address switchport switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q switchport mode trunk ! interface GigabitEthernet8/5 no ip address switchport switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q switchport [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow&#8230;4+ years later and I&#8217;m finally posting part 2.  Yep, the original config didn&#8217;t work quite right but I did get it working.  Here&#8217;s the result:</p>
<p>On the Cisco switch:<br />
<code>interface Port-channel98<br />
no ip address<br />
switchport<br />
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q<br />
switchport mode trunk<br />
!<br />
interface GigabitEthernet8/5<br />
no ip address<br />
switchport<br />
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q<br />
switchport mode trunk<br />
channel-group 98 mode on</p>
<p>etc...<br />
</code></p>
<p>On the Extreme switch:<br />
<code>enable sharing 1:1 grouping 1:1,1:2,1:3,1:4 algorithm port-based<br />
configure vlan "out_of_band" ipaddress 172.16.0.254 255.255.254.0<br />
configure vlan "out_of_band" add port 7:1 untagged<br />
configure vlan "out_of_band" add port 1:1 tagged</code></p>
<p>out_of_band was used for testing.  I put a PC on port 7:1 on the Extreme switch to make sure I could get to a PC on the Cisco switch.</p>
<p>Turns out I did full documentation on the test process and actually kept the doc!  I was amazed!  My notes suggest the only delay was when re-connecting ports that are part of the group they would not start forwarding for about 3 seconds. Otherwise it worked great!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thecruftofmybrain.com/2010/12/04/cisco-and-extreme-interoperability-%e2%80%93-part-2-%e2%80%93-lacp/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cisco ASA Standby device &#8220;copy TFTP&#8221; syntax</title>
		<link>http://www.thecruftofmybrain.com/2010/07/25/cisco-asa-standby-device-copy-tftp-syntax/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thecruftofmybrain.com/2010/07/25/cisco-asa-standby-device-copy-tftp-syntax/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 14:57:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>scott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cisco Routing and Switching]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecruftofmybrain.com/?p=500</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#8217;s a mouthful. I&#8217;ve been having a hard time figuring out how to successfully transfer images to the Standby ASA&#8217;s flash from the Active&#8217;s CLI. Finally figured it out. Here&#8217;s the syntax: failover exec standby copy /noconfirm tftp://{ip address}/{file name} disk0:/{file name} Without the /noconfirm it&#8217;ll fail. You also need a standby ip address on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a mouthful.  I&#8217;ve been having a hard time figuring out how to successfully transfer images to the Standby ASA&#8217;s flash from the Active&#8217;s CLI.  Finally figured it out.  Here&#8217;s the syntax:</p>
<p>failover exec standby copy /noconfirm tftp://{ip address}/{file name} disk0:/{file name}</p>
<p>Without the /noconfirm it&#8217;ll fail.  You also need a standby ip address on the interface facing the tftp server and I haven&#8217;t confirmed this but I think it might also need to be on the same subnet.  I&#8217;m still having some trouble with a situation where the standby ASA would have to reach another subnet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thecruftofmybrain.com/2010/07/25/cisco-asa-standby-device-copy-tftp-syntax/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>iPhone VPN and Cisco IOS, Part2</title>
		<link>http://www.thecruftofmybrain.com/2010/05/05/iphone-vpn-and-cisco-ios-part2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thecruftofmybrain.com/2010/05/05/iphone-vpn-and-cisco-ios-part2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 15:58:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>scott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cisco Routing and Switching]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cruft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firewall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone ipad vpn cisco ios]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecruftofmybrain.com/?p=495</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I previously posted about some luck I had getting IPSEC VPN to work from my iPhone to my IOS router/firewall. That post is now kind of useless because the source blog disappeared about a year ago. So, in order to make this useful again I&#8217;m posting my full IOS code (obfuscated for obvious reasons). Change [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I previously <a href="http://www.thecruftofmybrain.com/2009/02/01/iphone-vpn-and-cisco-ios/">posted about some luck</a> I had getting IPSEC VPN to work from my iPhone to my IOS router/firewall.  That post is now kind of useless because the source blog disappeared about a year ago.  So, in order to make this useful again I&#8217;m posting my full IOS code (obfuscated for obvious reasons).  Change the IP addresses and the group name and password and you should be good to go.  This uses the new(ish) method in IOS of zone based firewall.  It&#8217;s overly complex and really hard to parse for anything remotely complicated but it&#8217;s what I&#8217;m working with.  You&#8217;ll notice I used the SDM for most of the config.  Yep, I&#8217;m lame and I&#8217;m not afraid to admit it.  All of that zone config typing would have been a pain in the butt!  Also, be sure to use a pool that is different from your &#8220;inside&#8221; subnet.  Won&#8217;t work otherwise.  Also, it should be obvious but this config uses local users so you need to add at least one of those.</p>
<p>Keep in mind this will all change when iPhone OS4 comes out as it&#8217;s supposed to support SSL VPN&#8217;s.  Finally.  The IPSEC works perfectly fine for now though.  I&#8217;ve not tested this on my iPad yet since I haven&#8217;t had it out of the house&#8230;and it&#8217;s not a 3G model.  Don&#8217;t see why it wouldn&#8217;t work though.</p>
<p>And now the code:</p>
<p><code>aaa authentication login sdm_vpn_xauth_ml_2 local<br />
aaa authorization network sdm_vpn_group_ml_2 local</p>
<p>crypto isakmp policy 2<br />
 encr aes 256<br />
 authentication pre-share<br />
 group 2</p>
<p>crypto isakmp client configuration group mygroupname<br />
 key something_goes_here<br />
 dns 192.168.x.x<br />
 pool SDM_POOL_2<br />
 include-local-lan<br />
 netmask 255.255.255.0<br />
crypto isakmp profile sdm-ike-profile-1<br />
   match identity group mygroupname<br />
   client authentication list sdm_vpn_xauth_ml_2<br />
   isakmp authorization list sdm_vpn_group_ml_2<br />
   client configuration address respond<br />
   virtual-template 2</p>
<p>crypto ipsec transform-set aes-transform esp-aes 256 esp-sha-hmac<br />
!<br />
crypto ipsec profile SDM_Profile1<br />
 set transform-set aes-transform<br />
 set isakmp-profile sdm-ike-profile-1</p>
<p>class-map type inspect match-any SDM_AH<br />
 match access-group name SDM_AH<br />
class-map type inspect match-any SDM_ESP<br />
 match access-group name SDM_ESP<br />
class-map type inspect match-any SDM_EASY_VPN_SERVER_TRAFFIC<br />
 match protocol isakmp<br />
 match protocol ipsec-msft<br />
 match class-map SDM_AH<br />
 match class-map SDM_ESP<br />
class-map type inspect match-all SDM_EASY_VPN_SERVER_PT<br />
 match class-map SDM_EASY_VPN_SERVER_TRAFFIC</p>
<p>policy-map type inspect sdm-permit<br />
 class type inspect SDM_EASY_VPN_SERVER_PT<br />
  pass<br />
 class class-default</p>
<p>zone security ezvpn-zone</p>
<p>zone-pair security sdm-zp-ezvpn-out1 source ezvpn-zone destination out-zone<br />
 service-policy type inspect sdm-permit-ip<br />
zone-pair security sdm-zp-out-ezpn1 source out-zone destination ezvpn-zone<br />
 service-policy type inspect sdm-permit-ip<br />
zone-pair security sdm-zp-ezvpn-in2 source ezvpn-zone destination in-zone<br />
 service-policy type inspect sdm-permit-ip<br />
zone-pair security sdm-zp-ezvpn-in1 source ezvpn-zone destination dmz-zone<br />
 service-policy type inspect sdm-permit-ip<br />
zone-pair security sdm-zp-in-ezvpn2 source in-zone destination ezvpn-zone<br />
 service-policy type inspect sdm-permit-ip<br />
zone-pair security sdm-zp-in-ezvpn1 source dmz-zone destination ezvpn-zone<br />
 service-policy type inspect sdm-permit-ip</p>
<p>interface Virtual-Template2 type tunnel<br />
 ip unnumbered FastEthernet0<br />
 zone-member security ezvpn-zone<br />
 tunnel mode ipsec ipv4<br />
 tunnel protection ipsec profile SDM_Profile1</p>
<p>ip local pool SDM_POOL_2 192.168.y.y 192.168.y.z</p>
<p>ip access-list extended SDM_AH<br />
 remark SDM_ACL Category=1<br />
 permit ahp any any<br />
ip access-list extended SDM_ESP<br />
 remark SDM_ACL Category=1<br />
 permit esp any any</code></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thecruftofmybrain.com/2010/05/05/iphone-vpn-and-cisco-ios-part2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cisco AnyConnect Essentials still crushing it</title>
		<link>http://www.thecruftofmybrain.com/2010/03/21/cisco-anyconnect-essentials-still-crushing-it/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thecruftofmybrain.com/2010/03/21/cisco-anyconnect-essentials-still-crushing-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 14:50:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>scott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cisco Routing and Switching]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cisco anyconnect license asa juniper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecruftofmybrain.com/?p=492</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Seems my original post about the AnyConnect Essentials license is still quite popular. So why not capitalize on that! The license does work as advertised. It&#8217;s a replacement for the IPSEC based client that Cisco seems to have stopped development on. I&#8217;ve been using it in numerous situations and it works great! I just have [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems my <a href="http://www.thecruftofmybrain.com/2009/06/02/cisco-anyconnect-essentials/">original post about the AnyConnect Essentials license</a> is still quite popular.  So why not capitalize on that!  <img src='http://www.thecruftofmybrain.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>The license does work as advertised.  It&#8217;s a replacement for the IPSEC based client that Cisco seems to have stopped development on.  I&#8217;ve been using it in numerous situations and it works great!</p>
<p>I just have a funny situation though where my client was exploring alternatives to Cisco.  We got pricing for a couple of competitors including <a href="http://www.sonicwall.com/">Sonicwall </a>and <a href="http://www.juniper.net/us/en/products-services/security/netscreen/">Juniper</a> and let me tell you&#8230;whoo-boy!  I guess the others haven&#8217;t felt compelled to follow Cisco&#8217;s lead and they are still charging ridiculous sums for the SSL VPN clients.  Of course there were howls of protest about how their clients did so much more and that if you wanted the same level of functionality you had to pay for Cisco&#8217;s full SSL VPN solution.  All true, but who cares????</p>
<p>I want a simple client based SSL VPN to replace the IPSEC clients of old.  I don&#8217;t need all the fancy clientless stuff.  I suspect that&#8217;s true for a lot of customers.  Cisco&#8217;s pricing strategy for the AnyConnect Essentials is smart not just because they don&#8217;t want to continue to develop the IPSEC client but because it drives business away from their competitors.</p>
<p>Cisco, your choice in focus these days mostly pisses me off but this is a real winner.  A small bright spot in an otherwise dreary path you&#8217;ve taken.  Now, if you could find a way to ship ASA&#8217;s before the summer I&#8217;d be happy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thecruftofmybrain.com/2010/03/21/cisco-anyconnect-essentials-still-crushing-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fixing a weird Cisco syntax error</title>
		<link>http://www.thecruftofmybrain.com/2010/01/24/fixing-a-weird-cisco-syntax-error/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thecruftofmybrain.com/2010/01/24/fixing-a-weird-cisco-syntax-error/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 07:56:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>scott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cisco Routing and Switching]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cruft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Networking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecruftofmybrain.com/?p=478</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ran across this tonight. Someone had entered a prefix-list with the name &#8220;at&#038;amp ;t&#8221; instead of &#8220;at&#038;t&#8221; (wordpress didn&#8217;t like it either so I added the space between the p and the ; but they should really be together. Oddly enough, IOS wouldn&#8217;t allow the bad line to simply be deleted. The &#8220;;&#8221; had to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ran across this tonight.  Someone had entered a prefix-list with the name &#8220;at&#038;amp ;t&#8221; instead of &#8220;at&#038;t&#8221; (wordpress didn&#8217;t like it either so I added the space between the p and the ; but they should really be together.</p>
<p>Oddly enough, IOS wouldn&#8217;t allow the bad line to simply be deleted.  The &#8220;;&#8221; had to be removed so that the no command included &#8220;at&#038;ampt&#8221;</p>
<p>Probably some sort of a regex problem or an ascii escape character but it&#8217;s still kind of strange.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thecruftofmybrain.com/2010/01/24/fixing-a-weird-cisco-syntax-error/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cisco IPS doesn&#8217;t like ICMP redirects</title>
		<link>http://www.thecruftofmybrain.com/2010/01/05/cisco-ips-doesnt-like-icmp-redirects/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thecruftofmybrain.com/2010/01/05/cisco-ips-doesnt-like-icmp-redirects/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 16:19:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>scott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cisco Routing and Switching]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cruft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecruftofmybrain.com/?p=476</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve been trying to figure out why a pair of Cisco IPS (AIP-SSM in this case) wouldn&#8217;t auto-update signature files or connect to the new Global Correlation feature. The management interfaces were located on a subnet that was between the firewall and the internal L3 switch. The internal LAN&#8217;s are on the other side of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been trying to figure out why a pair of Cisco IPS (AIP-SSM in this case) wouldn&#8217;t auto-update signature files or connect to the new Global Correlation feature.  The management interfaces were located on a subnet that was between the firewall and the internal L3 switch.  The internal LAN&#8217;s are on the other side of the switch.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve known for a long time that Cisco ASA&#8217;s don&#8217;t support sending ICMP redirects.  Because of this the IPS&#8217;s default gateway couldn&#8217;t be set to the FW interface.  If I did that they would never be redirected to reach the internal networks.  I&#8217;ve never had a problem with IOS doing ICMP redirects though, so the IPS&#8217;s have been using the switch VLAN interface as the default gateway.  The switch sends ICMP redirects when the IPS needs to get out to the internet and the traffic goes direct to the firewall.</p>
<p>Except it doesn&#8217;t.  I could swear it did at one time in the past.  Either my memory is faulty or an image update on the IPS broke it.  Now, it seems the IPS tosses ICMP redirects.  My guess is it worries about man in the middle attacks and and ICMP redirect is a possible sign of that.  So even though the switch is doing the correct thing the IPS disregards it.</p>
<p>Moved the IPS management interface to one of the internal LAN&#8217;s and all is happy now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thecruftofmybrain.com/2010/01/05/cisco-ips-doesnt-like-icmp-redirects/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sometimes Cisco makes me laugh</title>
		<link>http://www.thecruftofmybrain.com/2009/12/04/sometimes-cisco-makes-me-laugh/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thecruftofmybrain.com/2009/12/04/sometimes-cisco-makes-me-laugh/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 18:20:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>scott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cisco Routing and Switching]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cruft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Networking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecruftofmybrain.com/?p=470</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;It works similar to access-list in that if you have any SNMP View on certain MIB trees, every other tree is denied inexplicably.&#8221;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk648/tk362/technologies_tech_note09186a0080094489.shtml#setupsnmp"><em>&#8220;It works similar to access-list in that if you have any SNMP View on certain MIB trees, every other tree is denied inexplicably.&#8221;</em></a></p>
<p> <img src='http://www.thecruftofmybrain.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thecruftofmybrain.com/2009/12/04/sometimes-cisco-makes-me-laugh/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cisco ISR G2&#8242;s on the way</title>
		<link>http://www.thecruftofmybrain.com/2009/10/14/cisco-isr-g2s-on-the-way/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thecruftofmybrain.com/2009/10/14/cisco-isr-g2s-on-the-way/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 15:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>scott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cisco Routing and Switching]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cruft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Networking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecruftofmybrain.com/?p=464</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve gotten a look at a powerpoint with the technical details now. Nothing too earth shattering. More of a natural progression of capabilities and performance. I&#8217;m such a geek. The one cool new feature is that they have finally put in a USB console port. Actually mini USB. I&#8217;m not sure of the wisdom of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve gotten a look at a powerpoint with the technical details now.  Nothing too earth shattering.  More of a natural progression of capabilities and performance.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m such a geek.  The one cool new feature is that they have finally put in a USB console port.  Actually mini USB.  I&#8217;m not sure of the wisdom of using that over the already present regular USB ports, but that&#8217;s ok.  I can&#8217;t find anything about how that&#8217;s going to work.  I expect you&#8217;ll have to install a driver for USB to COM on windows just like you do with the USB to Serial dongles but this should be Cisco provided.</p>
<p>How cool would it be if there&#8217;s a hidden driver for that in Windows 7 already.</p>
<p>Now all we need is a wireless USB KVM and you could manage a whole data center of routers without running more cables.  Better have some good security on that!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thecruftofmybrain.com/2009/10/14/cisco-isr-g2s-on-the-way/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

